MINUTES OF MEETING STOREY PARK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Storey Park Community Development District was held on Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. at the Offices of GMS­ CF, LLC, 219 E. Livingston Street, Orlando, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Rob Bonin Ben Kraljev Andrew Ashby Susan Kane

Also present were:

Tricia Adams Kristen Trucco Jan Carpenter Christina Baxter Alan Scheerer

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager District Counsel District Counsel
District Engineer by phone Field Manager

Roll Call

Ms. Adams called the meeting to order and called the roll. A quorum was present.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Ms. Adams: The first item on the agenda is public comment period. We have  no members of the public in attendance or on the line.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the April 22, 2021
Meeting
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is approval of the April 22, 2021, meeting minutes. These have been reviewed by staff. Are there any comments or corrections?
Ms. Kane: Just that Mr. Kraljev should be listed as Vice Chairman. Ms. Adams: Thank you, we'll correct Mr. Kraljev to Vice Chairman. Ms. Kane: Other than that, no changes.
Ms. Adams: Do we have a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Ms. Kane, seconded by Mr. Kraljev, with all in favor, the Minutes of the April 22, 2021 Meeting, were approved  as presented.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution	2021-15
Finalizing the Series 2021 Assessments
Ms. Adams: For the record, Christy from Poulos Bennett did join the meeting by telephone. The next item on the agenda is Resolution 2021-15. This is a finalizing resolution,  now that your bond issuance Series 2021 has closed. It includes the final version of the  Engineer's report as well as the Assessment Methodology based on your actuals. I will  go through those tables in the Assessment Methodology.  These are the most salient changes. Table 1 has not changed. Table 2 has not changed. But when you get down to Table 3, these are based on the actual interest rate and terms of your bond issuance. The coupon interest rate is 3.71 for your 30-year term. Your actual capitalized interest requirement is six months. 50% of your max annual debt service and your underwriters discount are all factored in. So, the total bond issuance was $6,030,000 and that allows for $5,566,882 in construction funds. I believe you h ve all reviewed those numbers.
Ms. Carpenter: The purpose, if you recall, we set assessments at a high level and then once the bonds are issued bring it down to a level for marketing purposes that you all have accepted.
Ms. Adams: Table 6 does show you a final debt service for the different product types. This is consistent with the other equivalent units throughout Storey Park CDD. Any questions regarding the resolution, the Engineer's report in final form, or the Assessment Methodology inclusive of the actual terms?
Ms. Trucco: I'll add too that this resolution approves the assessments in the amount of
$6,030,000 being added to the District's improvement lien book as well.
Ms. Carpenter: Which is required by law.
Ms. Adams: Let the record reflect that Rob Bonin has joined the meeting at this time. Ms. Carpenter: We are looking for Resolution 2021-15 to be adopted.
Ms. Adams: Do we have a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Kraljev, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor, Resolution 2021-15 Finalizing the Series 2021 Assessments, was approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution	2021-16
Authorizing and Confirming and Re­ Authorizing and Re-Confirming the Assessment Area Four Project; Equalizing, Approving and Levying Special Assessments
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is Resolution 2021-16. Jan or Kristen, did you want to introduce this item?
Ms. Trucco: Sure. If you all recall, we go through the process of declaring assessments and setting a public hearing and then we levy them at the public hearing. During the closing process for the bonds, there was a ten or eleven-foot discrepancy in the legal description. We spent a week or two and the surveyor could not confirm that those ten feet was not in lots. It wasn't a roadway, or it wasn't an edge somewhere. To be extremely sure that we never have a question on any of the assessments on those lots, we talked with Mark McDonald arid  said, "Let's be super sure since we can't get a surveyor to okay this that it's not a  lot  and  not something that should have an assessment on it." So, this is reconfirming the assessments on all the lots and then with the new legal description wherever those ten feet may end up laying to make sure that we don't have any property that wasn't properly assessed. So, we would look for approval of Resolution 2021-16, reconfirming the assessments for this new legal description with the ten-foot change and then 2021-17 is setting the public hearing at the future meeting to make sure we have them levied and then we can make sure when we put our notice for the bonds that we include the new legal description.

On MOTION by Mr. Kraljev, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor, Resolution 2021-16 Authorizing and Confirming and Re­ Authorize and Re-Confirming the Assessment Area Four Project; Equalizing, Approving and Levying Special Assessments, was approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution	2021-17
Amending Resolution 2021-14 Approving the Proposed Budget for the Fiscal Year 2022 and setting a Public Hearing
Ms. Adams: The next resolution is Resolution 2021-17. This is amending the resolution that you approved a last month's meeting regarding the proposed budget as well as the budget hearing. The proposed budget has not changed but what has changed is we have been able to confirm the meeting time and the location. In anticipation of residents attending the meeting we

discussed moving the meeting time to 6:00 p.m. to be a more convenient time for residents to  join the meeting. We also attempted to find a location as nearby Storey Park  as  possible, however due to COVID still impacting certain facilities and public library facilities, it turned out that Rosen Plaza Hotel on International Drive is the location that has been secured. So, your budget hearing is July 22nd at 6:00 p.m. at Rosen Plaza Hotel. You'll receive that  in writing. There is complimentary parking for residents and there should be plenty of space  to accommodate residents. Approval of this amending resolution approves the meeting location and time. Any questions? Hearing none,

On MOTION by Ms. Kane, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor, Resolution 2021-17 Amending Resolution 2021-14 Approving the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 and Setting a Public Hearing for July 22, 2021, was approved.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification of Series 2019 Requisition #4
and	Consideration	of	Series	2019 Requisition #5
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is a ratification of Series 2019 requisition #4 and then consideration of Series 2019 requisition #5. Included in your agenda packet under tab 7 is the acquisition of $9,386 for Fausnight Stripe and Line. This was for the installation  of signage, and this was all in the L3 area. Jan, can we take these together, or do we need to take them separately?
Ms. Carpenter: You can do it together.
Ms. Burns: And the next one which is awaiting Board approval is right behind requisition #5 and this is the amount of $849 and this will zero out the construction funds for that series.  Any questions? Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Kraljev, seconded by Ms. Kane, with all in favor, the Series 2019 Requisition #4 was ratified, and the Series 2019 Requisition #5, was approved.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification	of	Temporary	Access
Easement Agreement with Aaron and Joy Humphrey
Ms. Adams: The next item is ratification of a temporary easement that was granted to Mr. and Mrs. Humphrey at Storey Park. They requested the temporary easement for the purpose of

installing a pool. Operations staff verified the field conditions, and the temporary easement was reviewed by legal staff. Any questions?
Mr. Kraljev: Can we talk about this one? I have worked a number of instances where we've had considerable damage done to the CDD property, specifically with pools. I just want to take a moment to look at this specifically.
Mr. Scheerer: Right now, the current condition is they are going over a bahia grass curb across the bike path. The easement is between the bike path and the home. It looks like they are only going to have, if they don't mess anything else up, just some turf replacement and some plant replacement on this particular home.
Mr. Kraljev: So, is this not where that big damage occurred?
Mr. Scheerer: That was Ms. Pochecco, that's the next one. So, we'll have to get those pictures. Their pumper truck leaked some fluid on the asphalt.
Mr. Kraljev: What we would like to start doing is not having crossover .CDD property that comes in from the other side and they'll have to work things out with their neighbors to get in between the buildings. Alan and I talked about starting soon. So, I wanted to make the staff aware and Counsel.
Mr. Scheerer: We had an area next to the life station over in IS that they had stationed, there wasn't anything there at the time, but Lennar has come in since then and done all the enhancements and we don't want them going through that anymore.
Ms. Carpenter: Okay, that makes sense.
Ms. Burns: And the conditions before the pool instillation have been documented with photographs?
Mr. Scheerer: Correct.
Mr. Kraljev: Are we taking a deposit on those?
Mr. Scheerer: We're not, but the HOA holds a $2,000 deposit.
Mr. Kraljev: So, it goes to HOA first and then CDD? Do you think that $2,000 1s adequate?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes, I do. We'll just have them remove the asphalt and we'll repatch that whole area and it should be good.

Ms. Trucco: As a fallback we also have that indemnification language in the actual easement too. In case the $2,000 doesn't cover it all they are contractually obligated to reimburse us for any damage caused on our property.
Mr. Kraljev: And the other piece to be aware of aware of is that folks are dumping the fill and the export from those pools, we're finding it all over the community. I don't know how we police that.
Mr. Scheerer: Tricia and I can make sure that we add that any removal needs to be  offsite. And offsite doesn't mean on Moss Park property either.
Ms. Adams: Motion to ratify the temporary access agreement for Mr. and Mrs.
Humphrey?

On MOTION by Ms. Kane, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor the, the Temporary Access Easement Agreement with Aron and Joy Humphrey, was ratified.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Proposal	from
Fausnight Stripe and Line for Installation of 'No Parking' Signs
Ms. Adams: The next item in your agenda packet is a proposal for no parking signs and this is for the L2 area of the development. This is the only area of the development that's populated with residents that does not yet have signage. We have K under construction in terms of the no parking signs. There is not residents living there, but in L2 we do have residents living there and have already adopted the rules that allow for the instillation of no parking signs in L2. We have a proposal from Fausnight in the total amount of $8,975. I do want to draw to the Board's attention that we are exceeding what has been budgeted for your operations and maintenance expenses for signage by a significant amount. We budgeted $5,000 for signage and this year we have already spent $19,000 not including this proposal that's included in the agenda packet. Each proposal has been presented to the Board for approval. These have been primarily "No Parking" signs in order to implement the District's parking policies. We do have a developer deficit funding agreement and we anticipate that we'll be engaging.
Mr. Bonin: There is not another line item, where we have been performing under budget?
Ms. Adams: We will present the financials a little later in the meeting, but we can touch on that right now. Your prorated budget expenses are $527,000 and we've spent about $531,000. We have gone over in certain areas. Legal advertising and some other expenses that are related to

debt issuances and required meeting notices. Any further questions regarding the no parking sign proposal?
Mr. Bonin: Alan, have we covered L3 and L4?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes, sir.
Mr. Bonin: Those are much smaller.
Ms. Adams: L3 we were able to utilize those remaining construction funds. That's what we just approved in the bond requestion.
Mr. Bonin: As far as Lis concerned, now it's done.
Mr. Scheerer: Well, no. We have L2. Other than L2, everything is done.
Mr. Bonin: 15?
Ms. Bums: Yes, 15 is done.
Mr. Kraljev: Is Fausnight the only bidder on this scope of work?
Ms. Adams: We've been using Fausnight because they have been the most competitive bidder when it's been bid out in the past, and they have been very responsive and been continuously offering a discount to the District.
Mr. Bonin: I would recommend Mailbox and Sign Solutions as well. They do a great deal of our signage. They do all of our mailbox business, I'm sure they would give a good deal to the District as well.
Ms. Adams: Staff will reach out to Mailbox and Sign for a proposal for the 45 no parking signs as well as the 20 linear feet of yellow curb no parking stencil painting so the Board has a couple of options. You can wait until you have your next meeting and review both proposals or the Board can approve a not to exceed and whichever the low bidder is, would be the one that would be selected for the project. Do you want to do a not to exceed? Or do you want to take a look at both proposals next month?
Mr. Bonin: Look at both proposals.
Ms. Adams: Alright, we'll bring those back to the July meeting.
Mr. Kraljev: Considering that we are over budget.
Mr. Ashby: I think Mailbox will beat them.
Mr. Scheerer: As long as they are willing to come in and pre stake all the signposts and get locates for each sign, because that's the way Fausnight has been doing it.
Mr. Bonin: Let's make sure that we have the scope set.

Mr. Scheerer: What's happened is we've run into problems where we're getting ready to go install a sign and if you don't pull the locates for each sign location then that creates a problem. But we can work that out with these folks. If you all have a point of contact or somebody you can send me, just get me that information and I'll reach out to them and give them what we've already done and what's been going on at Storey Park in the past.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Addendum	to
Landscape Maintenance Agreement with OmegaScapes - Added
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is something that was added to the agenda after the publication last month. There are handouts today. OmegaScapes was asked to provide proposals for two different parcels. Parcel IS and Parcel K. You probably recall that back in 2020 when landscape services were bid out, OmegaScapes did provide a proposal for IS that was based on the landscape plans at that time. This partial proposal does not meet that full scope. Taking these one at a time, actually, l think Alan and Ben, you both met with OmegaScapes onsite this week, reviewed the extent of landscaping. OmegaScapes provided a proposal for
$291.50 per month. They also provided a diagram attached to the proposal to aid in identifying the service areas. This amount has been factored into the current budget. Your landscape contract agreement is one area where our actuals are below what's budgeted for year-to-date because they have not yet assumed responsibility for these.
Mr. Scheerer: Ben and I met, we did a walk. The only thing left will be the cell tower tract in 15 and that's coming along quickly.
Mr. Kraljev: Alan, l noticed they did not highlight that strip, gomg back to the maintenance strip to the ponds, they did not highlight it on the diagram.
Mr. Scheerer: This one here? It's because  it's already  being  done.  We  are  already  doing the strip between the two homes that go  back to  the pond  and the Boardwalk.  And then the two  side strips by the alleyway, those are already being  done.  This  is  what  we  walked  yesterday which was the OS tract on Storey Park Boulevard and the lift station and then the common area  tracts. These are three additional areas. They are under budget  for  what  was  estimated  in  the actual bid last year  and once we add  the cell  tower  tract  that  will complete  all the improvements in 15. Not 14 but 15. And then we also looked at the tract K which is the other proposal. There is a map here. l went ahead and put a text box on there that showed K4 and the K2 ponds. Those are

the two ponds that we have been asked to mow. Then coming into this area is another section of property here that we've been asked to mow, and we're going to go ahead and get that going. It's actually already been mowed. It was mowed the same day. That's done.
Mr. Kraljev: Rob, we're just trying to get ahead. You know how the ponds grow so fast and it's either pay another third party or folks are going to have to end up taking care of it and maintain it. So, the CDD is working with us ifwe can get ahead of it. We're also going to look at the aquatics as well.
Mr. Scheerer: I didn't get a chance to get an addendum for the aquatics. I've got the numbers though. For the K4 and the K2 pond, that total is $450 a month to do the aquatics. I'm working on them and next meeting we should have a proposal and we'll go ahead and add those two ponds to the aquatics maintenance agreement. For right now, to get them mowed and get them cleaned up and keep them that way. Keep the sidewalk easement free and clear due to all the construction, we felt it was prudent to go ahead and get a proposal.
Mr. Kraljev: The other thing we talked about, Rob, is this strip going in, they are in sales mode, and sometimes the construction site looks really shabby and I'm seeing customers come through there all the time. We are doing a little bit more a little bit earlier than we normally would. We've got it in the budget and we can do it. Again, otherwise I'm paying another third party to come in and do it.
Mr. Scheerer: And again, OmegaScapes after our meeting by the time I got to my next  job he had already mowed that green grass along the sidewalk. It looks really good. They mowed it and edged it and it's good to go for you.
Ms. Adams: Board members, you probably recall that parcel K was not included in the landscape bid packet. This is the first number we have seen for that. The proposed amount  for the attached diagram is $958.34 per month.
Mr. Scheerer: It's in the 2022 budget. We did factor that in.
Ms. Adams: Any comments from legal staff? Do we have a motion to approve the addendum to landscape maintenance agreement for partial 15 and partial K?

On MOTION by Mr. Kraljev, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor, the Addendum to the Landscape Maintenance Agreement with OmegaScapes, was approved.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports

Attorney
Ms. Carpenter: Kristen, do you have anything?
Ms. Trucco: No, we'll just be working on the resolutions for the re-levying assessments.
Ms. Carpenter: And then since the 2019 bond funds are used up, we'll start working on completion of that to make sure there is nothing left to turn over in those areas.
Mr. Kraljev: We did have a conference call last week with regard  to the direct parcel. So I have copies and I highlighted the best I could those tracts that need to be transferred.
Ms. Trucco: We'll be working on that.
Ms. Carpenter: We have an intern, and that's our number one task is going through CDDs to confirm where the ownership is. I came today just to make sure that the Board was a little bit up to speed on some of the residents that have been very outspoken. We have one resident and a friend and a third person that sent an email. As you know, maybe a year and a half ago the complaints were about parking. Those complaints were resolved.  Then the complaints  went to the dirt bikes which GMS has worked endlessly with having the local police set up undercover operations during spring break and did a number of things that have been very responsive according to the other folks that we hear from. There have been complaints as you know about parking, landscaping, garbage; those have all been responded to. Lately, and I say lately, the last six or eight weeks, the complaints have risen to the level of threats, complaints, individual complaints which we deem inappropriate from a legal perspective. I had one of my litigators who wrote a terse email saying, "Now that you have threatened staff of the CDD please have your attorneys contact us and stop further communication with the management and the Board will no longer be contacting you." There have been a handful of somewhat nasty, I would say, or not so polite emails, in response but we have not heard from any attorney or heard anymore else. I wanted you all to be aware today of those emails,  just forward them to us. We're trying  not to  bill our time for a lot of this because we know these cost all the residents every time these emails come. We have staff looking at them, we get them if it rises to a threat or something actionable, I'll pull a litigator to see if we have slander or liable or any of those other good things. Hopefully things will quite down. We know they've contacted a news station. There's been contacts to the city, who responded once or twice and just dropped it and I think that they added the state and a number of other people, but we've had no contacts from any of those people.

Mr. Kraljev: We're primarily talking about one member and possibly a second? That's  the extent of it?
Ms. Carpenter: Yes. A third person wrote something, and it was a one time and I have not seen that again. Again, I don't see it as anything. As a whole we seem to get very positive responses. I just wanted you to be aware since it has risen to the level of threats. We ask that she have counsel contact us so if you all get something just let us know so you're not having to answer any of those or if it gets higher than that you know what's going on. I guess it's a good time, just as a reminder with the budget coming up, and one of us will say that at the budget hearing if there are residents there, that you are looking out for the best interest of all the landowners in the District and all the residents and one or two people making a lot of comments and complaints is not necessarily the best interest of everyone because the things they asked for cost a lot of money and sometimes only benefit one area or another. Just a reminder that you're looking out for the best interest of everyone, and we'll make sure we say that at the budget meeting so everyone can hear that some of these complaints are costing them additional funds to residents who are not being impacted.
Mr. Kraljev: Thank you for the help.
Ms. Carpenter: Hopefully we've gotten to the end of it. It seems to be quieting down, but it just rose to a different level recently.

Engineer
Ms. Adams: Christy, do you have anything to report to the Board?
Ms. Baxter: I'm working on a little bit of a detailed to address the skateboarding issue on the storm structure over at L6-1. So, I have that submitted for review here hopefully tomorrow. Then we are also working on the annual Engineer's inspection report. We hope to have that issued tomorrow as well.
Mr. Kraljev: Just a quick note, I don't know if you've talked to Mark lately, but I  did want to bring up the waterline issue. Are you in that loop on the capacity issue for future development in that general vicinity? Does that ring any bells?
Ms. Baxter: Where is the location of the watermain issue?
Mr. Kraljev: There's a water capacity issue in the Storey Park area. Is that something you are working on?

Ms. Baxter: I'm aware of that. It more translates to future development parcels. We are reaching a point where the approved master utility plans require a completion of the watermain from where Storey Time Drive comes in to provide a connection to Orange County utilities storage and repump facilities, which at this point and time hasn't been constructed yet. We're kind of at a critical trigger point in terms of capacity out there. Parcel K is locked in the development we've got in the permitting process within the CDD.
Mr. Kraljev: Okay, as long as you are aware and are working on it. Because if they do put that line in it could impact Storey Park.
Ms. Baxter: You are correct. Yes, I'm aware. We've had active discussion with Knock Hard Properties and Orange County Utilities going on.
Mr. Kraljev: Does that also impact water pressure of existing infrastructure?
Ms. Baxter: It won't make it any worse. The connection that needs to be made is when that trigger actually increases water capacity and pressure throughout the area.
Mr. Kraljev: Okay, we've just had some water pressure issues out there and it could be part of it.
Mr. Bonin: Thanks, Christy. Ms. Baxter: You're welcome.
Ms. Adams: Just to follow up on Christy's comments, that outfall structure  that's in the L2 section, we've had several complaints from different residents who have complained about skateboarders on that outfall structure. Christy thought she had a very budget friendly solution with motoring some bricks in the area so she's going to provide a diagram that field staff can facilitate.

District Manager's Report
Ms. Adams: Under District manager's report we do have a few items for Board action. I also have few notes for the Board. As you know, your budget meeting is next month because there is an O&M assessment increase. There will be mailed notice to all the residents. I wanted to check in with the Board, if wanted, I can offer residents to participate in a budget information meeting on Zoom, perhaps two weeks ahead of the proposed budget meeting and budget adoption. That way we can answer some of those questions for anyone wanting to get feedback. The Board would not need to attend but the Board would be more than welcome to attend. A lot

of the questions that the residents have, they are new to CDDs, new to the way that the fees are collected, new to exactly what areas the CDD's, etc.
Mr. Bonin: Who would be fielding these questions?
Ms. Adams: I would be fielding the questions. We did have an informational meeting that Supervisor Kraljev participated in early in June. At that time most of the questions  were related to parking and parking enforcement. We also had a few miscellaneous questions regarding future Lennar development in areas that are going to be owned and maintained by the HOA.
Ms. Kraljev: The job you did, that presentation was great. It really was informative for  the homeowners who don't know what a CDD is.
Ms. Adams: We did receive follow up emails from residents who felt that it was worthwhile and appreciated that and hoped to have future informational meetings. Obviously, the budget is something that comes to mind.
Mr. Kraljev: We can have something that our sales folks can go through, Rob, to learn a little more basic information about what a CDD does upfront so that they can communicate effectively with our residents.
Ms. Adams: The salespeople are looking at it really from a resident perspective and the residents want to know what the impact is for them financially. That's their biggest question.
Mr. Bonin: I would suggest having it.
Ms. Carpenter: It certainly makes it easier at the budget hearing to have the questions you can answer ahead of time gone. A lot of times residents don't come once their questions are answered. They just don't understand when they get this letter that we are required to send something that has a lot more information than they need.
Ms. Adams: The letter has a lot of language that's required per statutes  and it's a very legal letter, so the information meeting can be more resident friendly language. The way that we facilitated that previously is working with the HOA to send out an email blast with a link to the Zoom meeting and scheduling that at an evening time so residents can participate. We'll do that and any Board members who would like to jump on certainly can. We can only have one Board member who is in attendance though. Otherwise, we would need to notice it as a workshop. No Board member attendance is required either. We will go ahead and get that scheduled and coordinate with the HOA.

Approval of Check Register

,

Ms. Adams: Also, under District manager's report we have approval of  the  check register. Included in your agenda packet under tab 1 is a summary of checks from April 16th through June 17th 2021, it does include a detailed register. The total amount of the checks is
$203,410.94. I am happy to answer any questions, otherwise this does require Board action so  we would be looking for a motion to approve.

On MOTION by Ms. Kane, seconded by Mr. Ashby, with all in favor, the Check Register totaling $203,410.94, was approved.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Ms. Adams: The next item is your balance sheet and income statement. We did take a peek earlier in the meeting when we were discussing the year-to-date spending and the allocation for signage. The budget does include your cash balance sheet as well as your general fund and it has information on your bond funds as well. No Board action is required, this is for informational purposes only. I'm happy to answer any questions if there are any.

m.	Presentation of Number of Registered Voters -1,596
Ms. Adams: The next item in your agenda is a presentation of the number of registered voters at Storey Park which is 1,596 registered voters in the Storey Park Community Development District. This is required to be presented to the Board because as you are aware we are looking for that benchmark of 250 registered voters and six years of being established. And  at that time the seats start to transition to qualified electors within the District. So, the next General Election in 2022 there will be two seats that will be part of the General Election process.

TWELTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Request Ms. Adams: Do we have any Supervisor's requests or other business? Mr. Kraljev: Our financial disclosure is due by July 1s•t
Ms. Adams: Yes, sir.
Ms. Carpenter: Did you all get reminders?
Ms. Adams: Did you get a form from your county supervisor of election on this? Ms. Carpenter: You can go online and get the form and you can fill it out online.
Ms. Adams: If any Board members need the forms, I am happy to provide those. Any other Supervisor request or other business? Hearing none,

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Kraljev, seconded by Ms. Kane, with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman